Alberta’s public sector is poised to strike

We’ve been far from labour peace for months now in Alberta, and the conflict is about to escalate again. Eight of the largest locals with the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees (AUPE) have voted to strike.

Locals 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 009 and 012 represent a significant fraction of Government of Alberta employees, including admin staff, correctional services workers, health-care workers. Their support for the strike was overwhelming. Eighty per cent of their members voted, says AUPE, and the strike measure got over 90% support.

“Going on strike is not a certainty. Our strike vote is valid for the next 120 days, but your bargaining committee’s primary focus is reaching a good deal at the bargaining table,” reads an update AUPE sent to its membership on Monday.

Expect to see AUPE demonstrate in the near future that these members aren’t just willing to strike, but logistically ready, too, by flexing their muscle at demonstrations like this week's rally at the Regional Hospital in Red Deer.

Opposition and labour change targets: from separatism to Bill 55

For two weeks, the discourse in Alberta has been flooded with coverage of separatists—unwarranted coverage, as I argued in our last newsletter. But over the weekend, the Alberta NDP and their labour allies did a hard pivot to a new matter of concern: the Health Statutes Amendment Act, otherwise known as Bill 55.

Bill 55 is a large piece of legislation and touches on a variety of matters. A solid chunk of it consists of simple corrections: the UCP’s carve-up and “re-focus” of Alberta Health Services (AHS) means that a lot of terminology in the health statutes need to be updated to remove things like references to regional health authorities, which haven’t existed since AHS was created in 2008.

But the substantive changes the legislation makes are outlined in its section specifying who is allowed to operate hospitals in Alberta. The first draft of Bill 55 would amend the law to now say that “the oversight Minister, by order, may designate … a person other than a provincial health agency or provincial health corporation” to manage hospitals under certain circumstances, one of which simply being that the minister deems it a good idea.

The NDP Opposition warns that this would allow the UCP to hand over control of hospitals to private management. Is this line of attack by the NDP and their allies in labour legitimate? By my reading, absolutely. It’s right there in the draft in very plain language.

But the UCP contest this. Since the first draft of Bill 55 was released they have consistently maintained that granting the minister power to put hospitals under private operation won’t increase the risk of the minister doing just that. In legislative debate over Bill 55, Minister of Health Adriana LaGrange called the NDP characterization of the bill “misinformation.”

“We are not privatizing health care,” asserted LaGrange in reply to criticism from NDP MLA Brooks Arcand-Paul. “In fact, we are making sure that there is a strong, publicly funded health care system available to all Albertans.”

Bill 55 passed third reading on Wednesday night.

(This post has been corrected from an initial version which incorrectly said that Bill 55's debate would continue into the next session. Sorry—it's a done deal. Apologies for the error.) 

From the Report

Sundries

This is the online version of the Progress Report email newsletter. Don't depend on some social media or search engine algorithm to find this content in the future. Sign up to get updates on the most important local political issues in your inbox every week. If you like what we do at the Progress Report there is also one big way you can support us and that's by becoming a monthly donor. The regular donations of the 500 or so regular monthly donors keeps this small, independent media shop going.


connect