Last week’s brutal, historic heat wave has highlighted just how unprepared Alberta is for climate change—and shown us just who will be most at risk.
Alberta has yet to fully tabulate the fatalities but the numbers from British Columbia, hit by the heat just before us, are bleak. The BC Coroners’ Service estimates that in our neighboring province nearly 600 people were killed by the heat. We can surely expect some grim statistics of our own once Alberta’s numbers are crunched.
The demographic characteristics of the most vulnerable aren’t surprising, as they’re largely the same categories of people our society usually consigns to death and misery: people who are unhoused, people who are struggling with poverty, people with disabilities, and the elderly. Of the latter category we once again see long-term-care facilities (particularly the private ones) turning into death-traps; in many provinces in Canada, LTC homes aren’t even required to have air conditioning. AC does not appear to be mandated by Alberta’s own LTC facility guidelines.
Climate change deniers often bleat after extreme weather incidents like these that isolated occurrences are not proof of a trend. But we’re far beyond the point of these occurrences being isolated, now. Records are being repeatedly broken, year after year, and have been for over a decade. There is an overwhelming amount of data demonstrating that Earth is getting hotter and that greenhouse gases are to blame.
But there is more to meeting the challenge of climate change than just doing our part to rein it in. Thanks to a couple decades of inaction there is a significant amount of damage to the climate that is now already locked-in; that pollution is already in the air, and while we might be able to avert three degrees of global warming, we’re likely stuck with at least one. Thanks to the way probability works—imagine a bell curve being shifted one notch over to the right—that means more extreme weather events like that heat wave. And that, in turn, means we need to get ready. At the moment we simply aren’t.
Why aren't those LTC homes air-conditioned? Why do our cities have barely any public washrooms or water fountains that unhoused folks can use? Why is there so little shade from trees in low-income neighborhoods? Why do our hospitals have so little surge capacity? These and more are questions we badly need to answer before the next heat wave hits.
This isn’t a hopeless scenario. We absolutely have the means to protect each other from something as simple as heat. But it’s going to take a bit of a push to get institutions that already are happy to sacrifice vulnerable people to start protecting them. Candidates for municipal elections—and possibly federal elections, too—will be at your door seeking your support soon. I recommend having the big question ready for them: there will definitely be a terrible heat wave again—what are you going to do to protect us from it?
Incidents of vandalism and arson targeting Catholic churches in Alberta continue to pop up in the news in the wake of the discoveries of hundreds of child graves at residential school sites across Canada. Premier Kenney has been forceful in his denouncements, but in a way that doesn’t sit very well. He has consistently described these events as hate crimes against Christians, which really misses the point: it would be more precise to describe these as motivated by rage than by hate. They are more akin to a slow-moving riot than a slow-moving pogrom. This may seem like a pointless hair to split but it is not. It’s first of all much simpler to cure a community of rage than of hate; to abate rage, you simply have to seek justice. But more concerningly, it’s more dangerous to attribute acts to hate than to rage, because giving people some delusional impression that Indigenous folks are violent anti-Christian bigots is certain to spur violence against them. There was a retaliatory attack on two totem poles in BC in the news just last week; and it certainly seems plausible that a resident of Langdon, Alberta, who intentionally tried to set brush fires around the Siksika Nation last week may have had similar motivations.
A Calgary mayoral candidate got one of the worst endorsements I can imagine this week: Jeff Davison got the nod from Steve Allan, the commissioner of Jason Kenney’s absurd anti-environmentalist inquiry project. This tip of the hat might push him ahead of Jeromy Farkas as the leading conservative contender, but it isn’t going to be received well by anyone who isn’t a die-hard UCP fan already. Davison is best known for chairing the event centre committee that oversaw the deal for Calgary’s new arena, a project which Steve Allan pushed hard for as well. The city revealed in late June that this arena deal is already at least $50 million over budget.
- The narrative being driven by the extremely UCP-aligned Calgary Herald is that business owners in Calgary despised the overdose prevention site at Sheldon Chumir, but is this really true? Several businesses operating close to the site are pushing back, and have teamed up with the national advocacy group Each+Every to urge the provincial government to reconsider its harsh approach to the opioid crisis. I doubt that the UCP administration will pay much heed to their open letter, but it’s important to understand that there is not, as the UCP might claim, monolithic opposition to harm reduction from the business community.
An earlier version of this newsletter attributed the total heat-related fatalities in British Columbia to only Vancouver Island. This newsletter has been modified to include a correction.
This is the online version of the Progress Report email newsletter. Don't depend on some social media or search engine algorithm to find this content in the future. Sign up to get the best left wing political newsletter in your inbox every Tuesday.